Understanding Contracts: the Statute of Frauds

Understanding Contracts: the Statute of Frauds

Contracts are at the heart of buying and selling real estate. This is because, by law, no real property can legally change hands (with the exception of a lease lasting less than one year) except through a written contract. This law is called the “Statute of Frauds.”

In order to be legally binding, a contract must contain certain basic information. First, it must explicitly name the parties involved in the deal. Failure to do this may make the contract impossible to enforce. Secondly, the specific boundaries of the subject property must be listed accurately, and with enough exactitude as to be easily identified. “By the long rock wall with a big oak tree at the north end,” unfortunately isn’t sufficient for the contract to be binding. Third, the purchase price for the property in question must also be listed and decided upon before the contract is signed, not after. Depending on the contract, it may also need to include such facts as closing date, the terms of the mortgage (if applicable), and information about the title of the property (amongst others).

Provided that a contract has all of the necessary information, the form that the contract takes contains a great deal of leeway. The contract could be many documents pieced together, some terms legibly scribbled on a napkin, or even an email chain (provided, of course, that they are sufficiently connected and that the required signatures can be proven genuine—a subject of no small amount of controversy). There is even one exception to the Statute of Frauds: in some cases an oral recitation of the contract may pass muster, provided that is obvious that all parties’ actions explicitly refer to the deal.

Hopefully, this tidbit of legal theory will help put the contract process into context. With any more specific questions, we would always recommend contacting a legal professional.

NYTimes: The Stuff We Leave Behind

What happens when sellers leave behind unwanted possessions after a closing? Whether an armoire or an armadillo, sometimes old property is left for the new homeowner to deal with, despite promises and guarantees to the contrary. In most New York contracts of sale, there will be specific language that attempts to grapple with what personal property will be taken or left behind. The attached article from the New York Times, entitled “You’re Taking that with You, Right?” approaches this question with humor, including anecdotes of situations both horrifying and heartwarming.

NYC Real Estate Attorney’s Closing Report: May 2016

Just a few of our recent closings. If you are also looking to buy or sell at these property addresses, you might want to give us a call.

Property Value Transaction
845 West 181st Street, NY, NY $286,000 Coop Refinance
900 West 19th Street, NY, NY $1,275,000 Coop Purchase
234 East 23rd Street, NY, NY $1,130,000 Condo Purchase
919 Mayfield Road, Woodmere, NY $730,000 House Purchase
29 Tiffany Place, BK, NY $2,440,000 Condo Sale
10 Tanner’s Neck Lane, Westhampton, NY $3,265,000 House Sale
415 Main Street, NY, NY $1,175,000 Condo Purchase
211 East 35th Street, NY, NY $306,000 Coop Purchase
93 Worth Street, NY, NY $1,100,000 Condo Purchase
195 Prospect Place, BK, NY $465,000 Coop Purchase

Partner Jack Harari Speaks at Twitter Event

On July 21st, WHFirm partner Jack Harari was a guest speaker at Buying 101, held at the offices of Twitter in New York City to a packed audience. The event, hosted by broker Roger Ma of Charles Rutenberg LLC, was held as a resource for employees interested in learning more about the New York Real Estate market.